| News flash, hold the front page!  It’s official; 
the ‘Magic Band’ came into being on June 27th 1945.  But hang on, 
didn’t the old codger suggest in the last issue that it was a small group of UK 
amateurs operating on the old five-metre band in the 1930s which lead to the 
birth of our six-metre band?  Well, yes he did, but that was yesterday’s news.  
That’s the trouble with searching the archives - one thing can easily lead to 
another.
 It was my good 
friend Bob Reif, W1XP who was quickly on the e-mail to remind me that the UK was 
not the only place where pre-war 56MHz operation was to be found.  Other 
countries had the band, notably the USA where as early as the 1920s ‘Five Metres’ 
was a popular and much-used band.  The steady progress made on this band in 
America is evidenced by a contact made on July 22nd 1938 between 
W1EYM and W6DNS over a path-length of 2500 miles, a new record and far in excess 
of anything achieved on the band in the UK prior to 1939.  But this was Five 
Metres, so what’s the relevance to the Magic Band?  How the ‘Magic Band’ was 
born It came about in this way.  In 
1944 some decisions were taken by the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) 
which, had the outcome been different, could have resulted in there never being 
a 50MHz amateur band at all and consequently none of those six-metre DXCCs nor 
any of the spine-tingling rare-prefix contacts which have been features of this 
and the previous solar cycle.  With World War II not yet over, the FCC embarked 
on a programme of post-war frequency allocations, the 44-108 MHz part of the 
spectrum being of particular interest.  This slot was earmarked for both 
television and FM broadcast services, where a huge post-war increase in the 
number of stations was anticipated.  There was a single amateur band within this 
range (56-60MHz) and with so many demands on the spectrum it would have been all 
too easy for the FCC to have selected an amateur allocation and presented it as 
a fait accompli but it did not.  Instead the American Radio Relay League 
(ARRL), representing the American amateur radio movement, was invited to 
participate in the decision-making process.  I believe that this was a further 
indication of the goodwill that always existed between the FCC and American 
radio amateurs, though on this occasion FCC may have had a motive in bringing 
ARRL into their discussions. The FCC presented the ARRL with 
three alternative band-plans for study, following which delegates from both 
sides would attend hearings where the issues would be debated and finalised.  In 
allocating frequencies for FM broadcast stations, FCC was concerned that 
sporadic-E propagation spanning the continent during summer months might cause 
havoc through co-channel interference if the wrong band was chosen for the 
service.  It was in this area that some input from the ARRL could be useful, 
since radio amateurs had enjoyed and exploited this mode of propagation on their 
56 MHz band for years.  With little or no commercial interest in this part of 
the spectrum at that time, amateurs probably knew a lot more about sporadic-E 
than many of the FCC engineers. In the first of the three 
alternative plans submitted to the ARRL, the FM broadcast service was placed in 
the 54 - 68 MHz band, right on top of the existing five-metre allocation.  
Amateurs would then move down to 44-48 MHz.  The second would allow amateurs to 
retain their existing 56-60 MHz band with FM broadcast assigned to 72-86 MHz.  
The final proposal offered amateurs 50-54 MHz with FM broadcast on 88-102 MHz.  
One can imagine how eyes must have lit up at ARRL at the prospect of an amateur 
band starting at 50MHz.  First, however, the League had to present its case and 
convince FCC that alternative three met a majority of both commercial and 
amateur requirements.   The ARRL’s general manager, 
Kenneth B Warner, was nominated as its main delegate.  Space only allows me only 
to paraphrase his presentation at the final hearing, but suffice it to say that 
while it was wholly professional, he could resort to very informal ‘ham radio’ 
language in arguing his case.  He opened by saying: “You propose to shift our 
band of 56-60 MHz, the first ever allocated in that part of the spectrum, to 
50-54 MHz.  We said that while we embrace that, it must be regarded as the limit 
of acceptable displacement.”  (That’s telling ‘em!).  He continued: “FCC 
Alternative No.  1 is distasteful to us because it would move the amateur band 
down to 44-48 MHz, and if move we must, we would much prefer not to move below 
50MHz.  We have done much work in the vicinity of 56MHz observing and studying 
the behaviour of these waves and we regard that job as incomplete and consider 
50MHz to be the lowest frequency to which we could move and permit continuity.”  
Warner then showed he knew all about six metres when he said: “Frequencies in 
the vicinity of 56-60 MHz have a particular interest for amateurs because they 
are located at what seems to be a unique transition spot in the spectrum.  
Sporadic-E occurs just sufficiently often to maintain amateur interest at white 
heat, and such frequencies are near the top-limit of where F2 transmission ever 
normally occurs “ Referring to information ARRL had provided earlier, and 
using slightly emotive language to describe the 56MHz band, he continued: “We 
have previously characterised the performance of this band to you as being 
erratic, unpredictable, unreliable and unexpected, a band where anything can and 
generally does happen, and we have explained that its very eccentricities give 
it a peculiar charm for us , though they make it singularly bad for regular 
service.  If we were moved to 41-48 MHz, it would be in a region where both 
sporadic E and F2 transmission occur so frequently that they would possess small 
novelty and much of the eager interest of amateur observers would disappear.  
The band would be neither fish nor fowl but regarded simply as an exceedingly 
unreliable long-distance band.”  Now came the point where the 
ARRL hoped to steer the committee towards alternative three and give amateurs 
the coveted 50-54 MHz allocation.  Since he was addressing a group with 
engineering backgrounds, he could employ a technical argument and he made a few 
assumptions.  He anticipated that after the war there would be large numbers of 
radio amateurs living in any typical community.  Should either 50-68 MHz or 
72-86 MHz bands be given over to FM broadcast, receivers for both of these bands 
would require an IF in the 10MHz region, with local oscillators probably running 
on the low frequency side.  This would make these receivers very susceptible to 
interference from amateurs who would then be operating in either the 44 MHz or 
56 MHz bands.  Next, to strengthen the case for putting FM in the highest range 
of 88-102 MHz, he brought up the subject of sporadic-E, commenting that: “Any 
person, amateur or not, who has heard sporadic-E bring in signals of local 
strength from a thousand miles away on the humblest receiver knows that 
considerations of sporadic-E alone compel the location of the FM service at a 
sufficiently high frequency to prevent this phenomenon from reaching it.” 
 So here was a powerful American agency, with a large staff of professional 
engineers, being nudged by a radio amateur towards a decision that would have 
repercussions throughout US radio and television industry!  The ARRL went on 
record as being opposed to alternative one but accepting alternative three. 
 The FCC carried out some 
sporadic-E tests, which must have satisfied them as to Warner’s predictions 
because on June 27th 1945 it was announced that alternative three was 
to be adopted.  The rest is history.  US amateurs got 50-54 MHz and the ‘Magic 
Band’ was born.  We in the UK and much of Europe had to wait forty more years or 
so for its general release.  Okinawa Less than two months later, the 
atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki brought to an end the war with 
Japan, Germany having already surrendered.  This left thousands of American 
military personnel in occupation of Japan and some neighbouring Pacific islands 
and for many of them it would be a long stay before they got back home.  
 Among them was a sizeable 
contingent of radio amateurs, who found themselves surrounded by masses of 
largely superfluous military radio equipment.  It has always been a feature of 
US amateur licences that they permit the handling of third-party traffic, so the 
GI hams were quick to see that amateur radio would be the perfect way to keep in 
touch with home.  The military saw its advantages too, and took swift action.  
An order was promulgated to the effect that Headquarters Eighth Army would 
assign calls to allied troops who already held operator licences.  Initially it 
was ruled that operators would use their home calls signing the portable 
indicator ‘J’, but this changed when Japan was sub-divided into 9 call areas, 
similar to the USA system, and three-letter J-calls such as J4AAA started 
popping up on the HF bands.  Many old-timers will recall hearing and working 
some of the J+3 prefixes from the Pacific on the 14 and 28 MHz bands during 
1946-7. It was inevitable that some of 
the pre-war 56 MHz addicts now on a Pacific island would want to sample the new 
six-metre band just as soon as they could find a military radio which could be 
persuaded to operate on it.  They were fortunate in that solar cycle 18 was near 
its peak, and it was a good one.   Okinawa Island, lying between 
the East China Sea and the Pacific to the south of Japan, was one of the 
occupied territories and was assigned the prefix J9.  The several amateurs 
stationed there formed themselves into a very active group and became well known 
as the J9’ers Radio Club.  Several of them, including J9AAK and J9AAO, were six 
metre enthusiasts.     The J8'ers radio Club on Okinawa, 1947.  J9AAO is 
third from the left, second row.
 Early in 1947, on January 25th,
J9AAK had a notable contact with KH6DD in Oahu, Hawaii, over a distance of 
4600 miles; this broke all records.  They made two contacts during the afternoon 
with signals briefly peaking at over S9.  Reports for the period state that 
J9AAK was using 68 watts (strange figure!) to a five-element close-spaced array, 
while KH6DD fed 500 watts into a “Twin-Three” array - an antenna system unknown 
to me.   These contacts raised six metre 
activity among the W6’s on the American West Coast to fever pitch, with daily 
schedules maintained with Okinawa, while strategically placed on Wake Island in 
mid-Pacific was W6VDG/KW6, a useful ‘half-way house’.  But the next big surprise 
which the magic band had in store did not involve the continental USA at all. 
  Chile Our scene now shifts to the 
small copper-mining town of Chuquicamata (try spelling that out phonetically in 
a pile-up!) in the Andes mountains of Chile, the home of Larry, CE1AH and his 
wife Ida, CE1AJ, both six metre enthusiasts.  In their remote location even the 
most basic components and materials to build a rig and antenna are non-existent, 
everything having to be shipped in over the mountains from afar (“Ida, they 
forgot the solder again!”).  When the rig is finally built, day after day 
spent in careful listening results in nothing being heard on the band.  Maybe 
the receiver doesn’t work or the antenna is dud, who knows?  No test gear within 
hundreds of miles, no other station to carry out a check.   Then at last, as more six-metre 
stations become operational, sporadic-E finally climbs the 18,000-foot mountains 
to reach Chuquicamata and some contacts are made with LU and PY.  Meanwhile 
Larry is working the DX on some of the HF bands, and one day on 28 MHz he hooks 
up with J9AAO on Okinawa - not a bad ten-metre contact in its own right.  By now 
J9AAO’s achievements on Six are legendary, so Larry begs for a try on 50MHz, 
knowing full well that a contact will be impossible of course since the J9 is 
situated half the world away.  Conditions don’t seem all that hot in Okinawa 
either, and the GI at that end is about to leave the house for a date anyway so 
he’s not very interested.  But he’ll settle for leaving his automatic keyer 
running while he is out, just to keep CE1AH happy.   Half-way down the pathway to 
his Jeep, all sorts of pandemonium bursts forth from the vehicle’s on-board 
mobile ten-metre monitoring receiver - frantic calls from Larry saying he is 
hearing J9AAO’s 50MHz beacon.  The GI runs back, and with hands a-tremble, 
switches on the main rig, picks up the mic and puts out a call, knowing for sure 
that like a thousand others there will be no response.  But this time back comes 
the hoarse voice of Larry who is now copying J9AAO, on voice at S3!  They make a 
two-way contact lasting just seven minutes before signals fade - a new world 
record, and what a payback for all those months of effort by CE1AH.  The date 
was October 17th 1947, the distance now recognised as 10,500 miles 
and believed at the time to be virtually unbeatable because the stations were 
located almost exactly diametrically opposite one another on the planet (see the 
cartoon which appeared in QST for December 1947).     Where do we go from here?  (QST December 1947)
 This was long 
before we had GPS, computer programs, grids and all that good stuff to calculate 
distances.  In reporting the contact in his Short Wave Magazine column, 
G2XC tried resorting to trigonometry and came up with 11,300 miles.   Final What is the world distance 
record on Six anyway?  I once held a record, for about ten minutes, and I have a 
certificate to prove it.  On 15th February 1992 I worked VK4KK on six 
metres, over a distance (so the parchment says) of 16416 kilometres or 10202.6 
miles, a distance-record for any VK4 station for the band. Note that 0.6-mile.  And hey! 
that’s only 297.4 miles short of the J9AAO-CE1AH contact .  With the certificate 
came a nice letter from the Wireless Institute of Australia saying “unfortunately, 
following your contact with VK4KK, he worked another station about 75 miles to 
your west, so the record passed to him.”  What I want to know is how did
they know it was short path and not long path?  Don’t you just hate those 
“unfortunately” letters? 
 UKSMG Six News
    
    issue 73,
May 2002 |  |